Brett Kavanaugh’s ’emotional’ testimony shouldn’t be held against him: White House

“But if you look at his actual record over 12 years, and he talked about it in this recent op-ed with The Wall Street Journal, in which he is committed to being a fair, impartial and evenhanded justice on the Supreme Court,” Shah said.

Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA via ShutterstockPresident Donald Trump speaks to the media about Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination as he departs the White House in Washington, Oct. 2018. The President said that the investigations into Kavanaugh’s past have led to a ‘scary’ time for young men.

(MORE: Kavanaugh latest: Sen. Collins will vote yes on confirmation citing ‘presumption of innocence’)

Kavanaugh’s at times combative testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week raised questions among some observers about his judicial temperament. In the op-ed on Thursday, he said his “sharp” tone was because he was speaking as “a son, husband and dad.”

“I was very emotional last Thursday, more so than I have ever been. I might have been too emotional at times. I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said. I hope everyone can understand that I was there as a son, husband and dad,” Kavanaugh wrote.

Kavanaugh is expected to be narrowly confirmed to the Supreme Court along partisan lines with the exception of one Democrat, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who, facing a tough reelection battle, announced he will support the president’s pick. Only one Republican, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, has said she will break with her party and not vote to confirm Kavanaugh.

Mary F. Calvert/ReutersSenators Tim Kaine and Joe Manchin arrive at the U.S. Senate for a procedural vote on the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh in Washington, Oct. 5, 2018.

(MORE: Kavanaugh defends himself in op-ed, says ‘I might have been too emotional at times’)

Shah on Saturday continued the White House’s defense of the president’s references to Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford at a rally last week, saying Trump was not mocking her but stating facts about the gaps in her memory of the alleged assault.

“You can disagree with his tone, but can you disagree with the substance?” Shah said. “And I think that the key here is that what he was pointing to are facts. He was stating facts.”

Shah said the president, who previously called Blasey Ford a “credible” witness, found the accuser’s testimony to be sincere but that she lacked corroborating evidence to meet the more-likely-than not standard.

Susan Walsh/APWhite House spokesman Raj Shah talks to reporters about the FBI investigation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, Oct. 4, 2018.

(MORE: Ahead of crucial Kavanaugh vote, hundreds of protesters rally in front of Supreme Court)

He added that the while the confirmation process for Kavanaugh has been “ugly,” the president is going to address what Kavanaugh will mean to the high court.

“I think the process has been ugly; it has been difficult; and it doesn’t bode well for future Supreme Court nominees and fights,” Shah said. “But I think we can learn a lot more from this process. I think the president is going to talk, though, about what this pick means to the court, to his legacy, to what he’s doing to try to make American jurisprudence a better — better for the country.”

Sourse: abcnews.go.com